The headlines tell one story. Your wallet tells another.
“Inflation is cooling,” the reports declare, but your grocery bill, rent, and utilities haven’t gotten the memo. If anything, the numbers on the receipt seem bolder every month. For traders, that gap between the official narrative and the lived experience isn’t just frustrating, it’s dangerous.
The problem is that the most-watched measures of the economy — CPI, PPI, and jobs data — aren’t neutral scorekeepers. They’re built on methodologies that can shift with political winds, subject to revisions that sometimes erase hundreds of thousands of jobs from the record, and almost always lag the reality on the ground. That means by the time you see the number, the market may have already moved — leaving you trading on a picture that’s not just incomplete, but potentially misleading.
In a market where speed, accuracy, and context are everything, traders can’t afford to take government data at face value. The disconnect between “official” inflation and actual inflation isn’t just a talking point — it’s a source of risk and opportunity. The question is whether you’re positioned for one or blindsided by the other.
The Consumer Price Index is designed to track the cost of living, but the methodology often underplays the pressure consumers feel. Substitution allows cheaper goods to replace more expensive ones in the basket. Weighting assigns less influence to certain high-cost categories. And hedonic adjustments — factoring in “quality improvements” — can reduce the reported price of an item even when the sticker price climbs.
Employment figures carry their own caveats. This year, the National Bureau of Economic Research quietly removed hundreds of thousands of jobs from earlier reports. Those revisions ripple through other data sets, distorting income, spending, and productivity readings.
Gross Domestic Product and productivity measures aren’t immune either. They depend on inputs like trade flows, inventory levels, and corporate investment data — each with its own margin for error.
And then there’s the timing problem. By the time CPI, jobs, or GDP reports are released, markets have often already moved on leaked expectations or private forecasts. For traders, that lag means the official number is rarely the first — or most accurate — signal.
The real issue with government data isn’t math. It’s human nature.
In a perfect universe — somewhere far, far away from Washington — numbers would be pure. Facts would be objective. “Two plus two” would never need a press conference to explain why it’s suddenly five. But here on Earth, objectivity is a rare bird… and in politics, it’s on the endangered species list.
In politics, everything is either a popularity contest or a quest for more power. Often both. And when you hand the people in charge of winning those contests control over the nation’s official “weights and measures,” you might as well give a fox the key to the henhouse. Not only will the numbers change, they’ll change fast, dramatically, and always in whatever direction makes the fox look good.
Nobody trusts government data anymore. Not really. They may nod at the headlines, but deep down, they know the game. The Bureau of Labor Statistics doesn’t exist to make you a better-informed citizen — it exists to make politicians look like they’re steering the ship straight.
What’s the fix? Rip the ruler out of the government’s hands. Let the private sector measure and report the numbers. Yes, it sounds radical. But if it happened, the grandstanding would vanish faster than a senator at a budget meeting. Without control over the scoreboard, government officials would have to focus on actual results instead of manipulating the perception of them.
Right now, we’ve got a bureaucratic class whose primary job is to keep their political bosses looking sharp, not to keep the data clean. Case in point: the latest CPI number 2.7% inflation. Everyone’s thrilled. Cue the victory laps on cable news.
But here’s the thing — when I look at my own expenses, the ones hammering my savings — insurance, food, utilities, property taxes — they’re up way more than 2.7%. And of course they are. Because the government doesn’t track the full scope of what’s killing your wallet. If it did, that number wouldn’t fit the narrative.
The truth is, they’re not measuring your inflation. They’re measuring the version of inflation that makes them look good.
Allowing the government to “accurately” report on its own economic progress is like letting a kid who hates school grade his own report card — and hand out the honor roll certificates while he’s at it. Suddenly, math isn’t a C-minus, it’s “Advanced Quantitative Problem-Solving Excellence.” Science isn’t a D — it’s “Innovative Independent Inquiry.” And gym? “Presidential Physical Fitness Award,” of course.
That’s exactly how it works with economic data. The scoreboard isn’t there to measure reality, it’s there to make the player look good. Numbers get “adjusted,” definitions get “updated,” and anything inconvenient gets shoved into the “seasonal adjustment” closet until nobody’s looking.
And just like that kid, the government learns quickly: if you control the grading, you control the story. Inflation suddenly “isn’t that bad,” unemployment “is holding steady,” GDP “is stronger than expected.” But the fridge is still empty, the rent’s still higher, and the bills keep coming.
The fix? You don’t let the kid grade his own papers. You hand the red pen to someone who isn’t invested in the outcome, someone who doesn’t care if the grade stings. Same with the economy: take the ruler away from the people being measured. Put it in the hands of independent, private-sector watchdogs with no skin in the political game.
Until then, we’re all just parents at a conference listening to little Johnny explain why the dog ate his math homework… and wondering why our grocery bill feels like an F when the government swears it’s an A+.
The reason this is important is because on August 1, 2025, President Trump fired BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer within hours of the release of a weak July jobs report and significant downward revisions to earlier months. He accused her — without evidence — of manipulating data to undermine him politically. The move prompted widespread alarm from current and former BLS staff, economists, and data objectivity advocates, who warned it threatens the independence and credibility of a traditionally apolitical, scientifically grounded agency
Alright, let’s talk about government data — that wondrous cascade of “facts” issued daily from the Ministry of Mathematical Confusion. Our elected officials, economists, and bureaucrats would have you believe they’re handing us the unvarnished truth, when in reality it’s closer to one of those cereal-box riddles — except the prize inside is more obfuscation, not a decoder ring.
Let’s start with the jobs report, the government’s monthly exercise in mass delusion. The Bureau of Labor Statistics will solemnly announce we “added” 200,000 jobs but forget to mention they also quietly subtracted 150,000 jobs from last month’s total because, whoops, turns out those weren’t real. That’s not a “revision,” that’s retroactive gaslighting. Imagine your bank telling you last month’s deposit wasn’t actually there — and could you please stop asking about it?
Then we have inflation data, otherwise known as the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which somehow manages to track the cost of living while leaving out the things that actually determine the cost of living — like food, housing, and energy. It’s like saying the Titanic didn’t really sink because the deck chairs stayed afloat. And just when you think you’ve got the number, they’ll seasonally adjust it, which is Washington’s way of saying “we don’t like how this looks, so we gave it a haircut and a spray tan.”
There’s GDP growth, which sounds important until you learn it can go from “robust expansion” to “mild contraction” in the time it takes for the Commerce Department to finish lunch and issue its third revision. By the time they’re done, the original number has been sliced, diced, and rebranded like a corporate merger no one asked for. And good luck figuring out if it actually means the economy grew or just inflated like a parade balloon.
Don’t forget unemployment rates. Officially, they hover in the single digits, making you think joblessness is rare and minor. In reality, that number is calculated by the elegant method of pretending millions of jobless people simply don’t exist if they haven’t applied for work in a while. This is like measuring obesity rates by excluding anyone who’s stopped stepping on the scale.
And then there’s the trade deficit, housing starts, retail sales, and every other “leading indicator” they trot out — each one an amalgam of raw numbers, questionable assumptions, and heroic guesswork. By the time the data is “adjusted” to fit the narrative, it has the accuracy of a weather forecast written by a psychic with a head cold.
The moral of the story? Government economic reports are a bit like modern art: you can stare at them all day, read the official description, and still have no earthly idea what you’re looking at. But unlike modern art, you can’t just walk away. They’re using this data to decide how much of your money to take, how much to print, and how to tell you everything is “just fine.”
Here’s the truth: this isn’t about giving you clarity. It’s about massaging the numbers until they purr, making sure you feel calm enough not to question who’s really writing the script. It’s political convenience wrapped in a statistical show tune, designed to keep you humming along while the ushers quietly pick your pockets.
Let me explain.
The recent CPI report came in at 2.7%.
Study the chart below which shows the price of U.S. Postage Stamps since 1958.
Here’s the thing nobody in Washington wants you to do: long-term math.
In 1958 a U.S Postage stamp cost 4 cents. Today that same stamp cost 78 cents. That is a 1,850% increase in price over 67 years.
Since 1958, the postage stamp, the simplest, most boring product in America — has gone up at a 4.9% compound annual growth rate every year. That’s not my opinion, that’s just raw, government-published price history.
Now, compare that to the “official” CPI they’ve been spoon-feeding you all these years. They brag about 2.7% average inflation over the long haul, as if they’re doing you a favor. But do the math — 4.9% is 81% higher than 2.7%. That’s not a rounding error. That’s like telling you it’s a gentle summer drizzle while you’re standing in a hurricane.
Why does this matter? Because stamps are a government-controlled product. No greedy CEO to blame, no shady supply chain excuse. If they’re hiking prices at nearly double the “official” inflation rate for decades… what do you think is happening to everything else you buy that they don’t control?
This is the inflation sleight-of-hand trick. They keep your eyes on their CPI “average” so you don’t notice your real-world costs ballooning like a Macy’s parade float. The result? Your paycheck buys less, your savings erode faster, and you’re left wondering why your budget never stretches as far as the “experts” say it should.
It’s not complicated. It’s just math. And the math says 4.9% beats 2.7% — by a lot.
In January 2024, the price of a U.S. first-class postage stamp was 68 cents. That’s the last officially published rate before the recent hikes.
Even since then, it’s gone up another 10 cents — landing at 78 cents today. On the surface, that’s a 14.7% increase in just over a year. But the real story shows up when you run it through the compound annual growth rate formula: it’s a 9.05% CAGR.
Now here’s where it gets ugly. The CPI — the government’s headline inflation number — currently reports 2.7%. That means the actual price growth in something as basic and government-controlled as a postage stamp is running at 235% higher than the official inflation figure.
And stamps aren’t cherry-picked exotic goods. They’re a standardized product, sold by the same provider, nationwide, with decades of pricing history. When even the most tightly managed prices are rising more than twice as fast as “official” inflation, it’s fair to question what the CPI is really measuring… and what it’s deliberately leaving out.
At its core, the critique of the Consumer Price Index is that it’s built on a shell game. Whenever a product’s price spikes too dramatically, it’s quietly removed from the “basket” and replaced with a cheaper, often lower-quality substitute. This isn’t inflation measurement — it’s inflation avoidance by spreadsheet. Instead of tracking the real, lived cost of maintaining the same standard of living, the CPI redefines that standard downward. Over time, the index stops reflecting the actual experience of consumers and starts reflecting the creativity of statistical bureaucrats in keeping the headline number politically palatable.
This approach may make for nice press releases, but it’s useless to anyone who actually needs to budget in the real world. The CPI doesn’t capture how much more we’re paying to live the same way we did a year ago; it measures the government’s skill at swapping in less expensive goods so it can claim progress in the “fight” against inflation. The result is a figure that tells citizens the economy is healthier than it feels — and in doing so, undermines both trust in the data and the policies built on it.
Recently I walked into what used to be a dollar store. Before the pandemic, every item in the place was — you guessed it — one dollar. Then came the “adjustment” to $1.25. Today, that same aisle of greeting cards, paper towels, and off-brand cookies will run you $1.50 each. That’s a compounded annual growth rate of roughly 10% — a pace that would make hedge fund managers blush. And yet, according to the official CPI, inflation is under control. Sure it is.
If you think this is just retail sticker shock, try this thought experiment: compare the price increase of a postage stamp to the performance of the S&P 500. Spoiler alert: when postage stamps increase more than the price of a stock portfolio you might need to reconsider how you are going to pay for your retirement.
The evidence is everywhere that the government isn’t telling us the truth about inflation. You don’t need a Ph.D. in economics to figure it out, you just need a grocery cart, a gas tank, and a faint memory of what things cost last year. The numbers don’t match the official story because the official story is written by the same people who would be out of a job if they admitted the truth.
Why? Because the government only has one true ambition — acquire more power for itself. And in the history of the world, no power has ever been greater than controlling a nation’s money supply. That’s the magic wand that turns bad ideas into “policy,” failures into “investments,” and political friends into billionaires. They won’t give up an ounce of that control, because once you give the public a ruler they can trust, they might start measuring what the government can and cannot do. And that, in Washington, is the one number they never want calculated.
Let’s quit pretending. Government data can’t be trusted.
Every government policy aimed at “fixing” the debt problem does the same thing — pours more debt onto the fire and slaps a slogan on it: “We can grow our way out of it!” Sure, we can. And I can eat my way into a smaller pants size.
The U.S. debt spiral isn’t just a problem — it’s an accelerating crisis chewing through our status as the top dog in the world. Deficits are surging, we’ve got massive rollovers from the Everest-sized debt pile we already owe, and the interest payments alone are about to crush the budget. Which means the Fed will soon have to step in as a permanent buyer of Treasuries — the buyer of first and last resort — just to keep the wheels from coming off.
Want some perspective? Back in 2000, the gross national debt was under $6 trillion. Now, in mid-2025, it’s blown past $37 trillion — a 520% increase in just 25 years. And our debt is now 740% of federal revenue. You don’t need a Ph.D. to see that’s a straight line to insolvency unless something changes yesterday.
It won’t. Because Washington’s plan is to add another $30 trillion in just the next decade — taking us to $67 trillion by 2035. It took America 250 years to rack up the first $37 trillion. We’ll add the next $30 trillion in one-third the time. That’s the fastest debt binge in modern history.
Deficits? Already at $1.36 trillion this fiscal year, up 14% over last year with months still to go. Annual deficits now eat up 6.4% of GDP, and the CBO says they’ll hit 9% — $2.7 trillion — by 2035. Oh, and we’ve got $9.2 trillion in debt maturing next year — almost a third of GDP. Even if we froze federal spending tomorrow, we’d still have to refinance that mountain at today’s higher rates. That’s not “managing debt.” That’s a death spiral in real time.
Interest payments have already overtaken defense spending — $1.11 trillion a year just to service what we owe, more than the $1.10 trillion we spend on national defense. CATO says it’ll hit $2 trillion a year in a decade. The private sector should be screaming. Rates should be spiking. But they’re not — because the Fed is in the corner, printing like mad and stuffing Treasuries into its own balance sheet while the rest of the world loses interest in financing our habit.
This isn’t fiscal discipline. It’s banana republic behavior with better suits and bigger microphones. And the punchline? The same people who drove us here keep telling you, “We can grow our way out of it.”
If inflation is really 2.7%, then parking money in Treasury bonds paying 4% makes sense—you’re locking in a safe, positive return. But here’s the catch: if inflation is actually higher than those yields—and your grocery bill says it is—you’re losing purchasing power every single year. That’s not investing, it’s slowly bleeding out while the government pats you on the head and tells you it’s fine.
Why the smoke and mirrors? Because in the next four months, the U.S. has to roll over $9 trillion worth of debt. That’s nearly a third of the economy’s output—refinanced at today’s higher rates. Admit inflation’s real number and you risk spooking the bond market, sending yields higher, and making that rollover an even bigger nightmare. This isn’t just a headline—it’s the story of our time: a government gaming the scoreboard because it is too financially threatened to play by honest rules.
Year-to-date, Gold is up 27%. Bitcoin? Also, up 27%. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 — propped up like a drunk uncle at a wedding by the “Magnificent 7”—is crawling along at just 10.17%.
Why are gold and Bitcoin both massively outperforming the stock market? You better have an answer to that question, because this isn’t a cute market quirk — it’s been the macro theme for the last 18 months.
Gold doesn’t rip like this unless the smart money smells smoke in the financial house. Bitcoin doesn’t run this far unless people are sprinting for the exits on fiat currencies. And when both are rising together? That’s a red siren over the entire monetary system — one asset is 5,000 years old, the other barely out of its teens, and they’re both screaming the same thing: “We don’t trust the paper!”
Meanwhile, the S&P’s gains are mostly thanks to a handful of tech behemoths holding up the tent while the rest of the circus quietly folds up. This isn’t a rising tide lifting all boats, it’s a rising tide lifting seven yachts while the other 493 ships take on water.
Ignore the message here, and you’re not just behind the trade, you’re behind the story. And the story right now is simple: the market is already voting on what it trusts with its money… and the answer isn’t the U.S. dollar.
Ask yourself — are you riding the biggest waves in the market with the sharpest boards… or still paddling around with gut feelings, CNBC noise, and a prayer?
Here’s the thing the pros know, and the guessers don’t: there’s a moment in every serious trader’s life when you stop chasing the market like a dog after a UPS truck… and you start making it come to you. That moment isn’t luck. It’s not some cousin’s “can’t-miss” stock tip. It’s the day you find a better way — scientific, disciplined, unblinking.
For thousands of traders, that day began when they told their emotions to take a hike… and let VantagePoint’s artificial intelligence run the show.
Yeah, skepticism’s healthy. If you aren’t skeptical, you shouldn’t be trading. But here’s my challenge: what if you had a trading partner that doesn’t get tired, doesn’t panic, and doesn’t suddenly decide “maybe this time will be different” right before it blows up your account?
This thing scans hundreds of global indicators, chews through millions of data points, and hands you a crystal-clear picture of where the market is most likely headed — before it gets there. That’s not science fiction. That’s happening right now, live, with real trades and real money.
And you can see it for yourself in a FREE live trading masterclass. No rah-rah hype. No filler. Just a blunt, behind-the-curtain look at how pros are using machine learning to see the trade before it happens, stay in it longer, and get out before it turns into a horror show.
Here’s the simple truth: machines are beating humans everywhere — chess, poker, war games, Jeopardy — and yes, in the markets. They’re not just playing better. They’re rewriting the rules.
So, if A.I. can humiliate the best human players in games of timing and probability… what chance do you think the average headline-chasing, emotionally driven trader has?
Trading is probability, timing, and pattern recognition. That’s what VantagePoint’s A.I. is built for. It spots patterns the human eye misses, calls reversals before the herd even smells a change, and keeps you riding the right trend while everyone else is bailing water.
I’m not asking for trust. I’m offering proof. Come watch it work. See the calls. Watch it dissect the market like a surgeon. Walk away with clarity, confidence, and an edge you can use immediately.
You can keep doing it the old way — guessing, chasing, hoping. Or you can step into a sharper, smarter, more strategic future.
It’s not magic.
It’s machine learning.
THERE IS A SUBSTANTIAL RISK OF LOSS ASSOCIATED WITH TRADING. ONLY RISK CAPITAL SHOULD BE USED TO TRADE. TRADING STOCKS, FUTURES, OPTIONS, FOREX, AND ETFs IS NOT SUITABLE FOR EVERYONE.IMPORTANT NOTICE!
DISCLAIMER: STOCKS, FUTURES, OPTIONS, ETFs AND CURRENCY TRADING ALL HAVE LARGE POTENTIAL REWARDS, BUT THEY ALSO HAVE LARGE POTENTIAL RISK. YOU MUST BE AWARE OF THE RISKS AND BE WILLING TO ACCEPT THEM IN ORDER TO INVEST IN THESE MARKETS. DON’T TRADE WITH MONEY YOU CAN’T AFFORD TO LOSE. THIS ARTICLE AND WEBSITE IS NEITHER A SOLICITATION NOR AN OFFER TO BUY/SELL FUTURES, OPTIONS, STOCKS, OR CURRENCIES. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE DISCUSSED ON THIS ARTICLE OR WEBSITE. THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF ANY TRADING SYSTEM OR METHODOLOGY IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. CFTC RULE 4.41 – HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD, SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING. ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT BEEN EXECUTED, THE RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER-OR-OVER COMPENSATED FOR THE IMPACT, IF ANY, OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS, SUCH AS LACK OF LIQUIDITY. SIMULATED TRADING PROGRAMS IN GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFIT OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN.
