Vantagepoint AI Blog

2026: Bullish, Bearish or Both?

Since 1990, the S&P 500 Index has told a very consistent story, even though the ride along the way has often felt anything but consistent.  First, the big picture. Roughly 8 out of every 10 years have been positive. That matters. It tells us that the long-term bias of the U.S. stock market is upward, even though the path is uneven and occasionally painful.  Across all the years in the dataset, the average annual return is about 12%. That number alone explains why equities remain such a powerful wealth-building tool over time. But averages hide important details, so let’s look under the hood.  The biggest up year in this period was 1995, when the market surged more than 37%. When the market goes up, it tends to go up decisively. In fact, the average gain in up years is roughly 19%, which tells us that strength, when it appears, usually persists.  On the downside, the worst year was 2008, when the market fell about 36%. Down years are fewer, but they can be sharp. The average loss in down years is about 15%. That asymmetry is important. Losses are less frequent than gains, but they demand respect when they occur.

Why The Brady Bunch Makes Modern Economics Look Ridiculous

Housing used to be the byproduct of a functioning economy. Now it’s a luxury good, priced like one, financed like one, and defended as one. And yet we’re told to celebrate growth as if rising output automatically translates into rising lives. It doesn’t. It just means more money is changing hands, often to solve problems that didn’t exist when money still knew how to behave.

Narratives Are Cheap. Trends Are Profitable. Know The Difference.

Benchmarks provided the answer. Without them, even strong returns risked becoming optical illusions. A stock that rose 10% in 2025 could appear successful in isolation yet still represent a missed opportunity if its sector or the broader market advanced twice as much. The S&P 500 and major sector indexes served as the market’s scorecard, revealing where capital was truly being rewarded. Traders who anchored their decisions to relative performance gained an objective lens through which to assess strength, avoid laggards, and stay aligned with institutional behavior. Those who did not were left navigating the year without a map.

Benchmarks or Blindness? How Awareness Separated Winners from Losers in 2025

Benchmarks provided the answer. Without them, even strong returns risked becoming optical illusions. A stock that rose 10% in 2025 could appear successful in isolation yet still represent a missed opportunity if its sector or the broader market advanced twice as much. The S&P 500 and major sector indexes served as the market’s scorecard, revealing where capital was truly being rewarded. Traders who anchored their decisions to relative performance gained an objective lens through which to assess strength, avoid laggards, and stay aligned with institutional behavior. Those who did not were left navigating the year without a map.

Silver Hits New All-Time Highs After 45 Years: What Traders Should Know Now

There are moments in the markets — rare, seismic moments — when a price chart doesn’t just move… it testifies. When it doesn’t just break resistance… it breaks history. Silver crossing the threshold of a 45-year trading range is one of those moments. Not a wiggle. Not a blip. A generational breakout, something so powerful, so undeniable, that even the loudest skeptics fall strangely silent..

Financing the Future: The $NVDA Options Strategy Wall Street Isn’t Talking About

The headline numbers tempt traders to chase, but the more important question isn’t whether Nvidia can continue climbing. It’s how to participate in the unfolding story without overpaying for exposure. In moments like this, when the market collectively exhales, the edge shifts from prediction to structure. This is where professionalism is measured: in the ability to harness the narrative without succumbing to its emotional gravity

Why the 50-Year Mortgage Is Just QE for the Middle Class

From the very beginning of organized markets, traders and investors have relied on comparisons to understand value. We have always measured one thing against another — price against earnings, price against assets, price against revenue — because numbers alone tell us little. It’s the relationship between numbers that reveals the truth. These valuation ratios became the compass points of investing: the quiet, reliable instruments that helped us judge whether a business was healthy, overextended, or full of unrealized potential. 

The Price-to-Madness Economy: Why Valuations Don’t Matter … Until They Do

From the very beginning of organized markets, traders and investors have relied on comparisons to understand value. We have always measured one thing against another — price against earnings, price against assets, price against revenue — because numbers alone tell us little. It’s the relationship between numbers that reveals the truth. These valuation ratios became the compass points of investing: the quiet, reliable instruments that helped us judge whether a business was healthy, overextended, or full of unrealized potential. 

    Request Your Free Demo

    +By providing my email and/or telephone number above, I agree to Privacy Policy and Terms of Service and consent to recurring email, phone, and/or text message communications for marketing purposes from or on behalf of Vantagepoint AI, LLC, including via automated technology, artificial or prerecorded messages, or using artificial intelligence, even if my phone number is on any state or federal do not call lists. Consent is not required for any purchase. Message and data rates may apply. You can withdraw consent at any time by emailing us at optout@vantagepointsoftware.com.

    Go to Top